Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zachary Svajda vs Noah Schachter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Svajda vs Schachter analysis and find out who is favored!
Zachary Svajda vs Noah Schachter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Svajda 1 - 0 Schachter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Svajda has won 51.35% of points on their second serve, while Schachter has won 46.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Svajda, in recent form, has won 52.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schachter has won 46.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.62% and 34.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Svajda has saved 55.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schachter has saved 60.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Svajda has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 45/ 27), with Schachter winning 50.82% (W/L 31/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Svajda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 110/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 12/ 18). Schachter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 21/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Svajda has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/ 14), where as Schachter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.98% of matches (W/L 26/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Svajda winning 1 times and Schachter being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Svajda winning 2 and Schachter winning 0. The last match between Svajda and Schachter was at the M25 Malibu, 06-01-2023, First, Hard with Zachary Svajda getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Svajda and Schachter have played a deciding set 0 times, with Svajda winning 0 times and Schachter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Svajda winning 0, and Schachter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Svajda has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.51 while Schachter has played against players with an average rank of 45.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Svajda has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schachter has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Svajda has converted 43.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schachter has converted 39.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
127
Rank
122
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
788
Rank
788
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
58% (143-105)
Career Total W/L
56% (92-73)
51% (20-19)
YTD W/L
46% (12-14)
$466,490
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Zachary Svajda vs Noah Schachter For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Svajda VS Schachter
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Zachary Svajda | Noah Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zachary Svajda | Noah Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 51% (20/19) | 46% (12/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (47/44) | 44% (26/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (431/409) | 49% (277/287) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (16/11) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 139 | 127 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 89 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:40 | 1:33:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.82 | 27.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1656/2618) | 60% (965/1617) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1133/1656) | 70% (675/965) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (494/962) | 47% (305/652) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (110/252) | 39% (63/161) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1042/2646) | 39% (602/1549) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 63% (5/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 39% (7/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (19/38) | 46% (12/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (6/14) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (21/17) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (21/4) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (18/3) | 20% (15/3) |
Zachary Svajda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Otto Virtanen
Player
Zachary Svajda
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
107)
15
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
55 of
83)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Zachary Svajda
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
12
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Gijs Brouwer
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Zachary Svajda
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Zsombor Piros
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Zachary Svajda
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Zachary Svajda
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Zsombor Piros
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Noah Schachter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Noah Schachter
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Alex Knaff
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Noah Zamora
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Christopher Bulus
55%
(
65 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
4
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
2
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
56 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Noah Schachter
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
7
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Noah Schachter
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Ren Nakamura
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
12
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Svajda Vs Schachter Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Svajda are available here and Schachter photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zachary Svajda
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
